In Union County, South Carolina, the formerly prosperous cotton mills that once employed numerous residents have vanished. Today, the county is labeled a “food desert,” indicating that a significant portion of its inhabitants reside at a distance from the closest supermarket. Addressing this challenge, community non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated efforts in 2016, working alongside farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the county, where roughly 30% of the citizens are Black and nearly 25% experience poverty.
Initially, Ms. Ashby funded the initiative with her personal savings and small grants. However, in 2023, her efforts received a significant boost when the Walmart Foundation—the philanthropic branch of one of the nation’s largest corporations—granted her organization over $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was part of a broader $1.5 million initiative aimed at supporting “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“It brought me to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates your efforts.”
Just two years ago, programs like this were widely backed by major corporations across the U.S., as the country reckoned with systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who died under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
Yet, several of these companies are now withdrawing from those pledges. In November, Walmart revealed it would end certain diversity programs, including the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, which had played a key role in providing Ms. Ashby’s grant.
Companies such as Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have all made similar moves, reflecting a broader corporate pullback from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
This change signifies a significant cultural transition, spurred partially by concerns over legal challenges, regulatory oversight, and social media backlash—pressures intensified by the new U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has aggressively worked to dismantle DEI programs, advocating for a return to “merit-based opportunity” in America. He has ordered the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and launch investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of engaging in “illegal DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put nearly 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump ousted the nation’s top military general—a Black individual—after the defense secretary had earlier recommended his removal because of his connection to “woke” DEI strategies.
At first sight, it might appear that the U.S. has forsaken efforts to better outcomes for racial and identity groups historically marginalized. However, some specialists propose that these efforts might continue, perhaps under alternative names that better align with the evolving political environment of a country that has recently elected a leader devoted to opposing “woke” policies.
The Origins of the Backlash
Initiatives similar to DEI first gained traction in the U.S. during the 1960s, in reaction to the civil rights movement, which aimed to extend and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described through terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these programs sought to address the enduring impacts of slavery and the institutional discrimination enforced under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements evolved to encompass women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the terminology surrounding these efforts broadened to include “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
In the realm of corporations and government bodies, DEI initiatives primarily concentrated on recruitment practices, portraying diversity as a financial benefit. Proponents claim that these programs tackle inequities across different communities, even though the focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The drive for DEI escalated in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations and rising calls for societal change. For example, Walmart committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo named its first chief diversity officer, while firms like Google and Nike already had similar positions established. As a result of these developments, S&P 100 companies generated over 300,000 new jobs, with 94% of them awarded to people of color, per Bloomberg.
Nonetheless, as swiftly as these initiatives grew, a conservative pushback arose.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, contends that DEI programs inherently separate individuals based on racial and gender lines.
More recently, critics have amplified their claims that DEI initiatives—initially intended to fight discrimination—are in themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Sessions focusing on “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.
The foundation of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic concept positing that racism is intricately woven into American society. Gradually, efforts opposing CRT in education broadened into wider campaigns aiming to penalize “woke corporations.”
Social media accounts like End Wokeness and conservative figures such as Robby Starbuck have capitalized on this sentiment, targeting companies for their DEI initiatives. Starbuck has claimed responsibility for policy shifts at companies like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after exposing their DEI programs to his online followers.
One of the most prominent triumphs for this movement took place in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Demands to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, based on an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another significant juncture came in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decided that race could no longer be a consideration in university admissions, effectively overturning decades of affirmative action practices.
This decision cast doubt on the legal standing of corporate DEI policies. Following the ruling, Meta informed employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” just before announcing the cancellation of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift retreat of DEI programs among prominent corporations raises questions about the genuineness of their dedication to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace matters—holds the view that many businesses initially adopted DEI initiatives to “appear favorable” following the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than from an authentic dedication to transformation.
Nevertheless, not all corporations are succumbing to political and legal pressures. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation indicated that although DEI programs seem to be diminishing, “nearly all” Fortune 500 firms still incorporate DEI pledges within their official declarations. Furthermore, Apple shareholders recently voted to preserve the company’s diversity initiatives.
Public opinion on DEI remains divided. A survey by JUST Capital suggests that support for DEI has waned, but support for related issues—such as fair pay—remains strong. Similarly, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that a majority (56%) of employed adults still believe that workplace DEI efforts are beneficial.
